Your basket is currently empty!
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Name: Dr Keeley Abbott & Dr Nadia Maalin |
| Keywords |
employability, transferable skills, skills audit, reflective task |
This reflective activity is designed for undergraduate students to assess the transferable skills they have developed over the course of a module, such as communication, critical thinking, and leadership. It can be used near the end of a module as an individual or paired task. Students review their skill development, apply the STAR or CAR technique to evidence their experiences, and reflect on how these skills align with employer expectations. The activity supports self-awareness, employability, and confidence in articulating their skills, helping students create actionable strategies for further development and future career success. The objective is to increase career readiness and adaptability in a competitive job market.
Time duration: 30-45 minutes
Student level: Any.
Preparation time before class: 20 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: None
Other general tips/advice:
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Name: Dr Chris Martin Chris’ expertise lies in academic skills development, English for Academic Purposes and Learner Psychology. He has taught across all levels within the UK education system (primary to doctoral level) and has held middle and senior leadership roles in education for the last 10 years. |
| Keywords |
Reflective task, creative approaches, metacognition |
The ‘Consolidation Triangle’ is a short, impactful reflective activity that encourages students to consider the content and to set aspirational questions to extend their learning further beyond the session. When embedded as regular practice, students will become more familiar with the practice of reflection which will, in turn, support their metacognitive development.
The objective of this activity is to encourage learners to be reflective by asking questions of themselves, their knowledge, and their skillset. By embedding this practice early on in students’ learning at university, it is hoped that students will become autonomous in their reflection.
Tried and tested (used and developed over three academic years or more)
Time duration: 5-10 minutes
Student level: ALL
Preparation time before class: minimal (uploading template to Moodle)
Additional materials or equipment needed: None
Other general tips/advice:
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Stephanie Chua Stephanie combines cultural and cognitive psychology to explore diversity in learning. Her research aims to understand how education can adapt to meet the varied learning needs in today’s multicultural classrooms. |
| Keywords |
notetaking, academic reading, information synthesis, referencing |
This activity supports students with note taking of academic journals and research articles. It helps students with first understanding what kind of information they need to take away from their independent reading and then take notes effectively so that all key information is in one place. The aim is for students to become effective and organised notetakers where they can:
Tried and tested (used and developed over three academic years or more)
Please complete the following key features in relation to your activity:
Time duration: 30 minutes
Student level: Any
Preparation time before class: 10 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: Computers/Laptops
Other general tips/advice:
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Name: Ben Colliver and Craig Kelly |
| Keywords |
artificial intelligence, reading skills, critical thinking |
The activity is utilised as a multi-week project, typically embedded on the modules as part of the formative assessment and has been embedded on various modules at both undergraduate and postgraduate level.
The activity is designed to recognise that the majority of students will engage with ChatGPT and relying on university software to detect and penalise this is rather redundant. Rather, the activity aims to demonstrate to students the deficit of such large language modules and that they cannot hit the higher mark thresholds with such technology as it is largely erroneous/ unable to engage in critical thought. As such the task is based upon encouraging use of AI.
The learning objective is quite simple: To critically assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in the context of criminological research.
Tried and tested (used and developed over three academic years or more)
Time duration: 2-3 weeks (usually started the week prior to reading week and culminating the week after reading week)
Student level: Any but primarily used on level 6 and 7.
Preparation time before class: 5 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: Access to ChatGPT and Library gateway
Other general tips/advice:
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Piers von Berg Piers teaches Law at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. He teaches critical thinking, human rights, criminal justice and children’s rights. He is interested in and researches human rights and citizenship education. |
| Keywords |
belonging, group work, ice breaker |
This is an ice breaker activity that helps students feel that they belong in the group. The purpose of the activity is to help students get to know one another by identifying shared characteristics. It can help build groups prior to groupwork as well as stimulating conversation between students. I always use it with new groups at the start of term but it can be used (or variations of it) when you put students into groups. It can also be used as a tool to introduce undergraduates to class ethos/norms (being respectful of differences, learning each other’s names) and to basic academic skills (such as listening, paying attention and taking notes).
Tried and tested (used and developed over three academic years or more)
Key words: belonging, group work, ice breaker
Further reading:
Please complete the following key features in relation to your activity:
Time duration: 10-15 minutes
Student level: Any
Preparation time before class: 5 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: None
Other general tips/advice:
Tried and tested (used and developed over three academic years or more)
Key words: belonging, group work, ice breaker
Further reading:
Please complete the following key features in relation to your activity:
Time duration: 10-15 minutes
Student level: Any
Preparation time before class: 5 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: None
Other general tips/advice:
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Name: Shey Fyffe Dr Shey Fyffe is a lecturer in Sociology and Black Studies at BCU and scholar-activist; Specialising in Black political thought, community organisation for social and political change , and social justice pedagogy across academic and grassroots spaces. |
| Keyword |
reflective task; teamwork |
To Introduce positionality /reflexivity as key concepts in critical study. (Appropriate for all social science humanities subjects).
Activity: Students are to, both individually, and in groups, answer a list of questions in a task named, “Exploring positionality and reflexivity” Exploring how their race, gender or social class/educational background has shaped their life experiences and perspectives so far, in addition to how they believe they are perceived in wider society.
Outcome: Students grasp how personal and structural factors shape lived experiences, and how to critically situate themselves within critical study/enquiry.
Tried and tested – used and developed over three academic years or more
Please complete the following key features in relation to your activity:
Time duration: 30 minutes
Student level: 1st and 2nd year university students.
Preparation time before class: 30 minutes.
Additional materials or equipment needed:
Slide deck or handout – Introducing positionality and reflexivity as key terms.
Discussion guide- A list of questions to support discussion.
Other general tips/advice:
Feel free to extend the discussion by choosing a social issue thataligns with each aspect of identity.
( E.G. Race- Black Lives Matter; Gender – reproductive laws/rights. Class- Minimum wage debate) and asking students to discuss how this issue could impact directly on them.
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Flo Hayles Senior Lecturer in Primary Education and Early Years Flo Hayles has taught all ages internationally and nationally, in state and private Education. She teaches and leads on the Primary Initial Teacher Training Programmes. She is interested in developing a love of learning at all ages and in spotlighting well-being in Education. |
| Keywords |
critical thinking, active learning, accessing prior knowledge |
To reveal and discuss students’ preconceptions about a given topic. activate and assess prior learning on [a given topic].
Sometimes, students can feel uncomfortable in openly sharing their individual initial thoughts on a topic when it is introduced in a forum environment. This activity is designed to support students in sharing initial misconceptions anonymously for ‘myth-busting purposes,’ so that misconceptions do not lie dormant as learning progresses. As such, it provides an opportunity for lecturers to assess prior learning and adapt the forthcoming session(s) so that learning is sequenced meaningfully for the cohort/group concerned.
Learning Objective:
To reveal and discuss students’ preconceptions about a given topic. activate and assess prior learning on [a given topic].
Sometimes, students can feel uncomfortable in openly sharing their individual initial thoughts on a topic when it is introduced in a forum environment. This activity is designed to support students in sharing initial misconceptions anonymously for ‘myth-busting purposes,’ so that misconceptions do not lie dormant as learning progresses. As such, it provides an opportunity for lecturers to assess prior learning and adapt the forthcoming session(s) so that learning is sequenced meaningfully for the cohort/group concerned.
Tried and tested (used and developed over three academic years or more)
Key words: critical thinking, active learning, accessing prior knowledge
Please complete the following key features in relation to your activity:
Time duration: 10-15 minutes
Student level: Any
Preparation time before class: 15 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: PPT slide, Padlet account and a ‘true’ and ‘false’ signs on opposing walls of the teaching space, sticky tape (*or mini whiteboards pens)
*If you have students with mobility challenges, or reluctant contributors in the early days of their university studies, you can invite students to hold up ‘true’ or ‘false’ on a piece of paper from the front of the class without everyone seeing what they wrote. Individuals with dyslexia may find black text on white background difficult on Padlet, signage and the PPT.
Other general tips/advice:
If the group contains learners with support summaries relating to cognitive processing, they may need a little longer to form judgements/ideas/stances; and, students may wish to have some time to discuss the ideas on the Padlet Therefore, you can give the class some time to discuss the ideas one to one with a partner before you invite them to move or display their choices for true or false.
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Name: Julia Gillies-Wilkes A lecturer and post-graduate module lead, Julia is an accredited psychotherapist and enjoys nothing more than bringing the two disciplines together by using creative approaches to teaching counselling to students. |
| Keywords |
Reflective task; teamwork; creative approaches |
This exercise supports learners to go beyond words and use 3-D model making to develop their thinking. It can be used to support academic learning on any topic to meet any learning outcome. The objectives of the session are to:
The attached Power Point presentation provides a generic lesson plan. The subject can be amended as required. Key things to remember as facilitator are to ensure you remain curious and engaged with what the learners are doing throughout.
Time duration: 90 minutes
Student level: Suitable for all levels where students are comfortable with self-reflection and dynamic group activity
Preparation time before class: 30 minutes
Additional materials or equipment needed: Lego, or any other available ‘building materials’ such as egg boxes, pens, boxes, straws etc.
Other general tips/advice:
Be prepared to make a noise and encourage people to bring some energy to the activity. For example, if using Lego, tip it all out so people can really rootle through and find the pieces that work for them. Encourage people to think metaphorically and allow their imaginations to soar.
| Attributes | Value |
|---|---|
| Contributor |
Dr Emma Craddock Dr Emma Craddock is a qualitative researcher specialising in gendered health inequalities and neurodiversity, applying a social justice lens to research and teaching. An experienced Research Methods educator, she is committed to supporting students to develop confidence in qualitative, participatory, and mixed methods approaches. Her academic background is Sociology. |
| Keywords |
Positionality, reflexivity |
This activity invites students to begin thinking about and reflecting critically on their positionality as researchers. It aims to introduce students to enacting researcher reflexivity and to open up discussions about researcher positionality.
Tried and tested: used and developed over three academic years or more
Key words: Positionality, reflexivity
Please complete the following key features in relation to your activity:
Time duration:
20-25 minutes but can be flexible
Student level:
All levels, but levels 4-5 might require more instructor input to discussions
Preparation time before class:
5 minutes to do the slides
Additional materials or equipment needed:
none
Other general tips/advice:
Try to encourage different perspectives and ensure that it is clear that this is a safe, respectful learning environment so individuals feel comfortable to speak up and to disagree.
Except where otherwise noted, all teaching materials on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).